Legal | TALKERS magazine - “The bible of talk media.” : TALKERS magazine – “The bible of talk media.”

Category: Legal

How Do the Dominion Lawsuits Affect Talk Hosts?

| August 13, 2021

By Steven J.J. Weisman
TALKERS magazine
Legal Editor

 

BOSTON — On August 11, Federal Judge Carl Nichols denied the motions to dismiss filed by Sidney Powell, Rudy Giuliani and Mike Lindell in regard to the defamation lawsuits filed against them by Dominion Voting Systems.  The defamation lawsuits stem from false claims Powell and Giuilani, both attorneys who had worked on the Trump presidential campaign and Lindell, the CEO of My Pillow, Inc and a frequent media commentator each had made about fraud in the 2020 presidential election, specifically related to baseless claims that Dominion had altered votes in favor of President Biden.

Read More

Protecting Your Company from Cyberattacks

| December 23, 2019

By Steven J.J. Weisman
TALKERS 
Legal Editor

 

BOSTON — It is being reported by Jerry Del Colliano that radio giant Entercom has suffered its second major cyberattack in the last three months.  The attack which occurred over the weekend appears to be another ransomware attack.  In a September ransomware attack, it was reported that the hackers demanded a ransom of $500,000 to return control of affected systems which included email, phones, production, billing, and other crucial systems.  These ransomware attacks are not isolated incidents.  In the last year, other major radio companies including Townsquare Media and Radio One were hit with similar ransomware attacks, as were numerous smaller radio stations.  You are never too big or too small to be a victim of a ransomware attack.

Read More

Learning from Entercom’s Ransomware Attack

| September 17, 2019

by Steven J.J. Weisman
Legal Editor
TALKERS magazine

 

BOSTON — Although not officially confirmed by the company itself, numerous reports indicate that media giant Entercom Communications has suffered a ransomware attack by unknown cybercriminals demanding a reported $500,000 ransom that the company is refusing to pay.  One of the more interesting aspects of this ransomware attack is the amount of the demand, which is much higher than most ransomware demands.  According to security company Coveware, the average demand this year is $12,762 — double the average demand in 2018.

Read More

The Fall of Craig Carton

| November 9, 2018

by Steven J.J. Weisman
TALKERS 

Legal Editor

 

BOSTON — While his lawyer, Robert Gottleib, has said that he will appeal the conviction of former WFAN sports talk host Craig Carton by a federal court in New York earlier this week, a jury’s verdict of guilty after five hours of deliberations on charges of securities fraud, wire fraud, and conspiracy to commit fraud most likely brings a sad end to a once-promising career.

Carton and his co-conspirators represented to investors that they had special relationships with the promoters of major concerts of artists such as Adele, Katy Perry, Justin Bieber and Barbra Streisand that enabled them to purchase large blocks of tickets at low prices and then resell the tickets at tremendous profits that would then be passed on to the investors.  The truth is that there were no contracts to purchase any tickets and the money received by Carton was used for his own personal expenses including extensive gambling debts.

Read More

Is it Against the Law for Terrestrial Radio to Say “Shithole” on the Air in Covering Trump Story?

| January 12, 2018

By Steven J.J. Weisman
TALKERS
Legal Editor

BOSTON – It is hard to give a definitive answer to the above question which is part of the problem because the indecency standards for broadcast radio are not particularly clear.  In 2012 when the Supreme Court ruled on this matter in response to enforcement decisions against Fox and ABC, the Supreme Court, unlike the lower appeals court did not rule that the present indecency rules violated the First Amendment.  Instead, by a vote of 8-0 they ruled in favor of Fox and ABC thus overturning the FCC’s decisions and fines against the networks on the grounds that the standards were too vague and there was not sufficient notice when the FCC changed its interpretation of its rules.    Specifically, the court indicated that, “This opinion leaves the Commission free to modify its current indecency policy in light of its determination of the public interest and applicable legal requirements.”  The FCC has not made any substantial changes to its indecency rules and has kept them in force, largely without any controversy for the last six years.

Read More